Safety and feasibility of PARP1/2 imaging with 18F-PARPi in patients with head and neck cancer

standard of care 18F-FDG and 18F-PARPi
Comparison of standard of care 18F-FDG and 18F-PARPi in a 52 year-old-male with cancer in the base of the tongue.

Heiko Schöder, Paula Demétrio De Souza França, Reiko Nakajima, Eva Burnazi, Sheryl Roberts, Christian Brand, Milan Grkovski, Audrey Mauguen, Mark P. Dunphy, Ronald A. Ghossein, Serge K. Lyashchenko, Jason S. Lewis, Joseph A. O’Donoghue, Ian Ganly, Snehal G. Patel, Nancy Y. Lee and Thomas Reiner*

Purpose. We performed a first-in-human clinical trial. The aim of this study was to determine safety and feasibility of PET imaging with 18F-PARPi in patients with head and neck cancer. Patients and Methods. Eleven patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent oral and oropharyngeal cancer were injected with 18F-PARPi (331 ± 42 MBq) and dynamic PET/CT imaging was performed between 0 min and 25 min post-injection. Static PET/CT scans were obtained at 30 min, 60 min and 120 min post injection. Blood samples for tracer concentration and metabolite analysis were collected. Blood pressure, ECG, oxygen levels, clinical chemistry and CBC were obtained before and after tracer administration.

Results. 18F-PARPi was well-tolerated by all patients without any safety concerns. Of the 11 patients included in the analysis, 18F-PARPi had focal uptake in all primary lesions (n = 10, SUVmax = 2.8 ± 1.2) and all 18F-FDG positive lymph nodes (n = 34). 18F-PARPi uptake was seen in 18F-FDG negative lymph nodes of three patients (n = 6). Focal uptake of tracer in primary and metastatic lesions was corroborated by CT alone or in combination with 18F-FDG. The overall equivalent dose with 18F-PARPi PET was 3.9 mSv – 5.2 mSv, contrast was high (SUVmax(lesion)/SUVmax(trapezius muscle) = 4.5) and less variable than 18F-FDG when compared to the genioglossus muscle (1.3 versus 6.0, p = 0.001).

Conclusions. Imaging of head and neck cancer with 18F-PARPi is feasible and safe. 18F-PARPi detects primary and metastatic lesions, and retention in tumors is longer than in healthy tissues.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s